Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant Member Jesús Castro CastilloBurkina Faso Recent Activity
Deviant for 6 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 143 Deviations 1,952 Comments 10,589 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Critiques

.:GIFT ART:. An Angel by CatWolfy

At the beginning, I thought this was going to be one of these awful cases of amateurs without much skill yet acting all tall-and-mighty...

Kalag- Oc by stillBrokenDoll

There's something here, well, two things actually, which bugs me. The first one is foreshortening. The second one is consistency. You t...

Tonnerre  la petite venise4. by hubert61

There is only one thing I have to critique: where is the sidewalk? The picture is good, except it feels incomplete. As if you have had ...

Deep Into That Darkness by Leanan-Bloodflower

Generally speaking, it's a good piece. If you like this kind of stuff, this picture will result very pleasing to your eyes. However, th...

Activity


I'm so but so relieved that in this modern days where seemingly any idiot can call herself an artist and brag about how many pageview and likes she has is what matters instead of her own skill prowess. 
All over the world, critics and professionals alike are slowy calling out these self-proclaimed "geniuses" who go around the museums, galleries, and internet communities talking of how great artists they are despite the fact that you need to: 1) get an explanation of what are you supposed to see; 2) and stare at the shit you have in front for like a week or two to finally "get it".

When I read Avelina's Lesper last talk at college students, I recall all these times I have seen here whatever hopeless, celebrity-wannabe get his ass kissed over and over again by pretty much horny, or stupid kids. And acting all high about it. If you don't worship their shit, you´re branded an idiot for not spending that much time looking at something trying to realise what the guy meant.

I have got to be honest, I do know what real art is and what real art is not. I have drawn myself things that makes me feel proud when I look at them, because I can do look at what makes them great. Managing to get the right shade of blur after hours or days of hard work to make something look a little bit more real, and a little less amateurish doesn't need to be explained to people. You can see it. You can see it in Hyperrealist artist creating genuine life in picture which leave you breathless without the need for the guy to stand next to them explaining to you why should be breathless.

I have witnessed works of art made by genuine professionals who leave me astoniushed in awe because of how well they handled what they were trying to do. Look at a Expressionist paint where the colours mimic the real shades of light and shadows while on a surrealist, simplistic version of a church is what I can tell is art. And not one shitty picture of yet another bastardized version of the same stupid animal mix many a kid will have to tell you what is in the it to get it. But in the end, it all looks like the same Don Bluth Ripoff with the same snout.

It's weird, when you take something, and successfully manage to mold it into something truly yours, using the intelligence and knowledge you are meant to display, you can actually make something which looks different to whatever person can do. So, to use a burned-out example: Warhammer 40000. There is a template, a single armor design allowing people to customize them in such endless ways where you can hardly see a lookalike design when you put a bunch of competent artist side. Despite pulling the first sip from the same dwell, you will find that they will flavour with uncountable amounts of themes and references from all over the world. Or they can create brand new ones out of sudden.

But that's the point. On one side, you got the people with the knowledge and the skills. On the other side, you got a bunch of idiots using the same 3D-render, with the same textures, and the same templates to make hundres of lookalikes and then get their asses buttkissed by the lowest common denomiator, a.k.a. a horny loser who will worship his spank-fodder source thinking that it will either grant him special priviledges, or at least be part of something. Besides furiously fapping to the pretense of boobs. Or dicks. Or the chance of passing up as a smart person because they "can" see what the secret message that feeble peasants can´t see in a random spot. So random that not even the guy who did it had any control on where and how was that stain supposed to be like.
.:GIFT ART:. An Angel by CatWolfy
At the beginning, I thought this was going to be one of these awful cases of amateurs without much skill yet acting all tall-and-mighty.

It surprises me that the quality of this drawing is not that bad. I don't know how much do you know of anatomy, but at least this drawing here says that at some point you took your time to try and understand how does something looks when it is sitting...or maybe this is the most absurd coincidence in the history of chance and luck.

Now, there not much I can praise, except for the decent attempt. I would recommend you to start studying basic shapes to begin with. Cans, bottles, boxes; all these things will help you understand depth. The joke here that you start to understand how does foreshortening works.

That alone should help you improve things like this.

I would also recommend you to create "bases" for your characters. Like an sheet for every different body type which says how long must a limb and hand be in comparison to tother body parts.

This can be done using "blobs" and " sticks. You take one stick for the arms or one for the head, then start adding blobs and sticks for every body part. If you feel you can combine stick or blobs to create single pieces, the better. Look at it like trying to solve a puzzle. When you start by finishing one part before starting with another. When you got several parts completed, you join them to create a bigger picture.

If you also want to beat the crap out of the amateur level, study anatomy, and try your best to learn "standards" from it. For example, the leght of the human body is of 7 heads and a half. And the width depends on the gender; 3 heads for healthy males, and two-and-a-half heads for healthy females. These standards are called "body proportions". All the species in the world have them. It just takes time and effort to figure them out. And some more time to learn to play with them without creating an "uncanny valley" effect (when something looks like one thing, but it gives you a creepy feeling that something is wrong with it and you can´t tell what. For an example, look at the pictures of creepy dolls)

Now, all this is going to take time. You won't become an expert this year, even if you start now working at least an hour per day. The trick is to take whatever you can from normal life. Observing, practicing what you observe, etc. All this only works if you study from real life. Trying to copy other's works won't help you in the least.

Vision: Well made. It might be a coincidence that this didn't look awful. But it still looks better than most amateur works. The key is that the disproportion is not so uncontrolled.

Originality: Gave stars to the pose. For the most part, the most common poses amongst amateurs are alway the same standing and side-view still pose.

Technique: It won points because this looks a lot better than most pictures in you gallery. This almost feels like a small improvement.

Impact: I thought at first this would be awful. Now I can say I was wrong.
There's something here, well, two things actually, which bugs me.

The first one is foreshortening. The second one is consistency.

You try to create a cute pose with a leg lowly raised. You try to mimic the shape of a humanouid leg without creating the human leg first. Likewise, the fingers ignores the basic rules of the combination of anatomies (human and rabit) it tries to mimic.

Instead, it desperately tries to copy somebody else's style. In this attempt, the author made the thumb on each feet smaller than it should. Meanwhile, the concept of small finger is non-existant.

There is no thing as the ankle. If an ankle is to be displayed, it helps a lot it reflects its function.

Again, the worst offender is the right leg. Trying to look cute, but failing to portray depth. The big killer her is the two dimensional feet which doesn't portray the complex position it is in. In truth, without the shadows, it´s still possible to create the illusion of depth. It only takes practice. Studying from life. Not from existant illustrations.

This would have been solved simply by looking at model with a similar pose. Poses like that are avialable online. For free. Even porn models do that one pose from time to time. Not only that, but also you will find pictures of women wearing a skirt with the same pose. Because the skirt is not telling me she's raising her leg.

With all these issues worked, this would have been an ashtonishing picture. However, there's still much to be done. Also, it would be better to try brighter lines if you want to display and details on darker colours. Since there is no lights to tell depth. And shadows doesn't work on pitchblack black.

That´s it. Even if you try to make up for it, it won't improve on its own. And the only person affected here is you. With a good knowledge of depth, this would have passed for a Professional-class illustration. Also, it would be good to try more than the standard full-frontal standing pose.

Vision: I´m not really impressed by the whole concept. What catches my attention is the distorted anatomy and the combination of two different species. That's cool.

Originality: Cleavage, pale skin, black dresses, black & red, and sewn lips are like hogs and mud. You won't see one without the other in the emo fashion. Though, it gains points for the anthropomorphic creature and the inclusion of yellow.

Technique: There's so much that needs to be done. Both aesthetically as, as technically. Just because of the leg, and the not-so cute position of the arms and the torso, the whole illusion of cutesy gets lost.

Impact: This is 2/5 personal, and 3/5 technical. I don't really like the emo-goth culture. But what affects the whole thing is the poor design in clothing. It feels lazy, as if adding details was too much of a bother.

deviantID

MakarovJAC's Profile Picture
MakarovJAC
Jesús Castro Castillo
Burkina Faso
What's going on this side?

Personally, I don't like Abstract art. They are the prime excuse for incompetent morons who can't do a thing for shit to try harvest some attention off pompous rich morons. Surrealism, on the other side, is a completely different story.

Anyways, I can give advice on improvement. For ego fueling and attention-craving, there you have the rest of DA. Tip: If you don't get any better, stop wondering why you aren't getting any e-fame. By the way, e-fame is the least important thing for you. Getting better at it should be. Otherwise, try Facebook. Remember to wear no bra and to smile, dumbass!
Interests
I'm so but so relieved that in this modern days where seemingly any idiot can call herself an artist and brag about how many pageview and likes she has is what matters instead of her own skill prowess. 
All over the world, critics and professionals alike are slowy calling out these self-proclaimed "geniuses" who go around the museums, galleries, and internet communities talking of how great artists they are despite the fact that you need to: 1) get an explanation of what are you supposed to see; 2) and stare at the shit you have in front for like a week or two to finally "get it".

When I read Avelina's Lesper last talk at college students, I recall all these times I have seen here whatever hopeless, celebrity-wannabe get his ass kissed over and over again by pretty much horny, or stupid kids. And acting all high about it. If you don't worship their shit, you´re branded an idiot for not spending that much time looking at something trying to realise what the guy meant.

I have got to be honest, I do know what real art is and what real art is not. I have drawn myself things that makes me feel proud when I look at them, because I can do look at what makes them great. Managing to get the right shade of blur after hours or days of hard work to make something look a little bit more real, and a little less amateurish doesn't need to be explained to people. You can see it. You can see it in Hyperrealist artist creating genuine life in picture which leave you breathless without the need for the guy to stand next to them explaining to you why should be breathless.

I have witnessed works of art made by genuine professionals who leave me astoniushed in awe because of how well they handled what they were trying to do. Look at a Expressionist paint where the colours mimic the real shades of light and shadows while on a surrealist, simplistic version of a church is what I can tell is art. And not one shitty picture of yet another bastardized version of the same stupid animal mix many a kid will have to tell you what is in the it to get it. But in the end, it all looks like the same Don Bluth Ripoff with the same snout.

It's weird, when you take something, and successfully manage to mold it into something truly yours, using the intelligence and knowledge you are meant to display, you can actually make something which looks different to whatever person can do. So, to use a burned-out example: Warhammer 40000. There is a template, a single armor design allowing people to customize them in such endless ways where you can hardly see a lookalike design when you put a bunch of competent artist side. Despite pulling the first sip from the same dwell, you will find that they will flavour with uncountable amounts of themes and references from all over the world. Or they can create brand new ones out of sudden.

But that's the point. On one side, you got the people with the knowledge and the skills. On the other side, you got a bunch of idiots using the same 3D-render, with the same textures, and the same templates to make hundres of lookalikes and then get their asses buttkissed by the lowest common denomiator, a.k.a. a horny loser who will worship his spank-fodder source thinking that it will either grant him special priviledges, or at least be part of something. Besides furiously fapping to the pretense of boobs. Or dicks. Or the chance of passing up as a smart person because they "can" see what the secret message that feeble peasants can´t see in a random spot. So random that not even the guy who did it had any control on where and how was that stain supposed to be like.

AdCast - Ads from the Community

Journal History

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconjasminecreates:
JasmineCreates Featured By Owner Sep 22, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Hi I really like your art. Keep up the good work dude :3
Reply
:iconjoeslucher:
JoeSlucher Featured By Owner Sep 18, 2014  Professional Digital Artist
Thanks for the fave Jesus!
Reply
:icondazza1008:
dazza1008 Featured By Owner Aug 28, 2014
Welcome to Dreddheads, Citizen. Dredd smile by QUELLER-UA

:bulletred: Introduce yourself here
:bulletred: A lot of Dredd art is in our faves
:bulletred: Please follow us also on Twitter, Facebook and Tumblr!
:bulletred: Since many praise the movie Dredd (2012) as a faithful adaptation and awesome movie, please make sure to sign the official petition if you'd like a sequel.

~:peace:
Reply
:iconlycoris-laulu:
Lycoris-Laulu Featured By Owner Aug 19, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Hello there! erm.. well I don't really know how to word it, so i'll just cut straight to the point.

Would you please give me a critique? 

I've been drawing and such since I could pick up a pencil, and I know i'm getting better.
But I think having some honest opinion outside of my close family and friends would be wonderful! Aside from that i'm impressed with previous critiques you've made.
Reply
:iconmrtdark1:
Mrtdark1 Featured By Owner Aug 17, 2014
Do you do critiques?
If so, can you critique Crocobat?
Reply
:iconmakarovjac:
MakarovJAC Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014
Who is Crocobat, and why should I critize him/her? Criticize what about him/her?
Reply
:iconmrtdark1:
Mrtdark1 Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2014
mrtdark1.deviantart.com/art/Cr…

Its not a person,it's a work.
Reply
:iconspellpearlarts:
SpellpearlArts Featured By Owner Aug 15, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Thank you so very much for the +fav Heart
Reply
:icondevduck01:
devduck01 Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Thanks for faving :)
Reply
:iconpaulsinclair1:
paulsinclair1 Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2014  Professional Digital Artist
Thanks for faving my Dredd painting - much appreciated ;)
Reply
Add a Comment: